Author Topic: Fairfax 4th Q Results  (Read 4886 times)

JEast

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
Re: Fairfax 4th Q Results
« Reply #40 on: February 17, 2012, 11:20:08 AM »
I appreciate the comment, but I am not second guessing H&W as I have the same view.  I am first guessing the approach as the balance sheet is now big enough that we shareholders do not need to be as hedged as much as we once needed to be.  Just shades of grey on the approach.

Cheers
JEast

Partner24

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Re: Fairfax 4th Q Results
« Reply #41 on: February 17, 2012, 12:20:18 PM »
A bad year on the underwriting side (far from being the first one), a bad year on the hedge side, a good year (fortunately) on the bond side.

Some of their stuff I like a lot (like good, big and cheap big companies), some of their stuff I wonder what they are doing there (like RIM), and the macro stuff that I can't predict.

If the insurance business prices are getting interesting, it's a good thing to write more business, as long as you not fooling yourself with "catastrophes are not normal part of the business" kind of mindset.

It's been some time since I've reviewed a lot of things in details with FFH, but overall, correct me if I'm wrong, but Fairfax will do very well if their deflation scenario happens, and will do bad if interest rates increase significantly.

Regarding the stock price drop today, we're at about the same level as last october. Nothing to be excited or worried that much. Remember 2003? ...

 






Corner of Berkshire & Fairfax Message Board

Re: Fairfax 4th Q Results
« Reply #41 on: February 17, 2012, 12:20:18 PM »