Author Topic: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.  (Read 2386406 times)

emily

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9230 on: January 20, 2018, 04:42:58 PM »
Fortunately, such research and activity is the only thing that matters than your constant posting on why commons should be zero. I have seen you post such here and routinely on stocktwits that commons are worthless. It doesn't matter what you say, you can spend your energy where you like: what matters is the activity such as this as it represents buying of more than 16.26% outstanding common shares of Fannie and Freddie combined in recent months and that too at the end of the year. They also bought a lot of preferreds.  Only thing I do know if that if commons do well, my preferreds will be at par.




Why did Capital Group spend more than half a billion dollars and bought ton of commons and preferreds? Do you think they invested in speculation? As far as I can see most companies they hold are rock solid in their portfolio.  They aren't so called vulture hedge funds either. This fund is Virginia fund where both Fannie and Fredddie are located? Coincidence? Do they know something? I am not sure but it says College America 529? Taking childrens education for a ride if it is related to 529 plan administered in Virginia?

Virginia College America Growth Fund of America 529F
67 million shares of commons (5.79%)
NEW

https://beta.morningstar.com/stocks/pinx/fnma/quote.html

Virginia College America 529-F-1
http://www.savingforcollege.com/529_plan_details/index.php?page=plan_details&plan_id=89

Who knows and unfortunately activity and research like this couldn't be more useless.  I think its time to put a conspiracy theory or that maybe the manager of a 529 fund "knows something"
« Last Edit: January 20, 2018, 05:49:58 PM by emily »


emily

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9231 on: January 20, 2018, 05:53:43 PM »
10.47% of Freddie Mac common shares were acquired in the 529 College Savings Plan in recent month
https://beta.morningstar.com/stocks/pinx/fmcc/quote.html

5.79% of Fannie Mae Common shares were acquired in the 529 College Savings plan in recent month
https://beta.morningstar.com/stocks/pinx/fnma/quote.html


Contributions to a Virginia 529 plan of up to $4,000 per account per year are deductible in computing Virginia taxable income
http://www.savingforcollege.com/529_plan_details/index.php?page=plan_details&plan_id=89


Why is this not big news?

rros

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 531
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9232 on: January 20, 2018, 07:21:32 PM »
Mnuchin/Watt signed off on the letter of agreement (acceptable version of a 4th A) with NO drama. That is after Mnuchin said he expected the full dividends to be paid to Treasury and Corker vociferously took a shot at Watt. Truth is, anything can happen any time.

CP is not going to ring a bell the day before administrative action takes place. They did not do it before the letter of agreement. And if they take admin action, Congress will be unable/unwilling to stop it. Even if a few more senators become vociferous.
https://www.fhfa.gov/Conservatorship/Documents/GSEAgreementLetters_12-21-2017.pdf

Most of us were blindsided by that agreement. In spite of being the most obvious move that had to be taken and in spite many of us having anticipated it.

Shares will fluctuate. But the most obvious thing right in front of us is Mnuchin wanting to cash in the warrants. Specially, to further consolidate the economy via fiscal policy (infrastructure). We are at the end of the line and 2019 may see a recession.

Luke 5:32

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2134
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9233 on: January 20, 2018, 07:38:57 PM »
Mnuchin/Watt signed off on the letter of agreement (acceptable version of a 4th A) with NO drama. That is after Mnuchin said he expected the full dividends to be paid to Treasury and Corker vociferously took a shot at Watt. Truth is, anything can happen any time.

Great point.
"Lead me with strong hands, stand up when I can't. Don't leave me hungry for love chasing dreams, what about us? Show me you're willing to fight, that I'm still the love of your life." Listen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLr6G8Xy5uc

investorG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9234 on: January 21, 2018, 06:18:57 AM »
Mnuchin/Watt signed off on the letter of agreement (acceptable version of a 4th A) with NO drama. That is after Mnuchin said he expected the full dividends to be paid to Treasury and Corker vociferously took a shot at Watt. Truth is, anything can happen any time.

CP is not going to ring a bell the day before administrative action takes place. They did not do it before the letter of agreement. And if they take admin action, Congress will be unable/unwilling to stop it. Even if a few more senators become vociferous.
https://www.fhfa.gov/Conservatorship/Documents/GSEAgreementLetters_12-21-2017.pdf

Most of us were blindsided by that agreement. In spite of being the most obvious move that had to be taken and in spite many of us having anticipated it.

Shares will fluctuate. But the most obvious thing right in front of us is Mnuchin wanting to cash in the warrants. Specially, to further consolidate the economy via fiscal policy (infrastructure). We are at the end of the line and 2019 may see a recession.

at this point I am not expecting any administrative action until mid to late 2019, if then.  phillips just said so (based on confirmed accounts of the end of his speech).   the expected gain from warrants of ~100bn seems inflated (would require ~$15 stock prices and likely monetized only over multiple years).  also they likely want to do comprehensive reform with charter changes (away from implied company guarantee model), which requires congress.  finally, mnuchin has given himself until 2020 to fix this.

the bull case for common for 2018, as I now think about it, rests in a) a court victory b) ironically, corker's bill passing that gives the common a decent shot of recovery in receivership (sr pref would need to be cancelled) and/or c) a democratic sweep in November.

cherzeca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1295
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9235 on: January 22, 2018, 08:15:15 AM »
the turn of events going forward will contain surprises no doubt.  but as i sit here, i see a sen bk ctee that has a staff that seems to be taking direction from MBA-inspired fellow travelers (as per previous failed legislation attempts) and a fhfa director who has put out much more sensible and palatable view of things.  i'll take this hand as dealt

TonyG

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9236 on: January 22, 2018, 08:47:45 AM »
also, do you think its most likely Watt ran this white paper by Mnuchin?

hardincap

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 642
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9237 on: January 22, 2018, 09:14:47 AM »
@investorG, no reason to think we won't see the c+w bill soon-ish (before midterms). if the sources who leaked that prefs may get "par or close to it" are to be believed, this should be a very positive catalyst

emily

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9238 on: January 22, 2018, 09:34:26 AM »
Do plaintiff's have to file a response to the defendants's reply in the supreme court? If not, when do they must decide to hear it or not. If they decide to hear, it will be a game changer.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/17-591.html

investorG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9239 on: January 22, 2018, 09:51:47 AM »
@investorG, no reason to think we won't see the c+w bill soon-ish (before midterms). if the sources who leaked that prefs may get "par or close to it" are to be believed, this should be a very positive catalyst

hardincap, nice to hear from you.

unfortunately we're likely headed down for now after phillips doused any hope of admin reform and his comments on shareholders.  the corker news may or may not be true, and it's old info.  and any house bill, if one is introduced, certainly won't be friendly.