Author Topic: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.  (Read 2085918 times)

Luke 5:32

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2101
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9400 on: February 12, 2018, 11:10:23 AM »
$5,065,000,000 draw (payment to GSE's) anticipated by Treasury.

See "Payment to GSEs pursuant to PSPAs" on page 932 of this document: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/tre-fy2019.pdf
"forgiveness was bought with the precious blood of Jesus Christ..." Listen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYQ5yXCc_CA


Luke 5:32

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2101
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9401 on: February 12, 2018, 11:48:38 AM »
$5,065,000,000 draw (payment to GSE's) anticipated by Treasury.

See "Payment to GSEs pursuant to PSPAs" on page 932 of this document: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/tre-fy2019.pdf

Hmmm... (hat tip to Peter Chapman for finding this interesting entry)

Proceeds, GSE Equity Related Transactions...
2017 actual: $25.349B
2018 estimated: $6.147B
2019 estimated: $18.297B

Proceeds, GSE Equity Related Transactions: Legislative proposal, not subject to PAYGO...
2019 estimated: $439M

Page 962: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/tre-fy2019.pdf
"forgiveness was bought with the precious blood of Jesus Christ..." Listen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYQ5yXCc_CA

Luke 5:32

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2101
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9402 on: February 12, 2018, 12:13:41 PM »
Proceeds, GSE Equity Related Transactions: Legislative proposal, not subject to PAYGO...
2019 estimated: $439M

Page 962: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/tre-fy2019.pdf

$439M = Increase in g-fees?
"forgiveness was bought with the precious blood of Jesus Christ..." Listen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYQ5yXCc_CA

rros

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 449
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9403 on: February 12, 2018, 01:15:24 PM »
https://www.treasury.gov/about/budget-performance/strategic-plan/Documents/2018-2022_Treasury_Strategic_Plan_web.pdf

Page 16 and 17 discusses Fannie/Freddie.
I lit a cigar and filled up a glass of scotch figuring I would need a few hours to read the "discussion". It took only one puff.

rros

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 449
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9404 on: February 12, 2018, 01:17:46 PM »
Treasury has treated us, is treating us and will treat us as nobodies. Forever. No matter who is at the helm. Maybe it's the lawsuits. Or the lawsuits may have taken the hatred to new heights.

Eye4Valu

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 294
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9405 on: February 12, 2018, 02:08:57 PM »
As usual, Tim Howard does the best job summing it up:

"There are two issues here. The first is that until Fannie and Freddie are removed from conservatorship (or liquidated), or until the net worth sweep is declared illegal or cancelled, the budget document will show continued receipts from the sweep for the full ten years of the projection. There is nothing of any policy significance here; itís just budgeting convention. As for the ten basis point increase in guaranty fees, unless there is some discussion about this elsewhere in the document (which I havenít read, and donít intend to), I would think that given the large amounts of red ink produced over the forecast horizon by the tax reform package and recent spending agreement, the budgeteers are looking for any credible assumptions they can make that will produce more revenue; every $25.7 billion they can put into their projections makes the projected deficit smaller."

investorG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 431
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9406 on: February 13, 2018, 05:49:03 AM »
As usual, Tim Howard does the best job summing it up:

"There are two issues here. The first is that until Fannie and Freddie are removed from conservatorship (or liquidated), or until the net worth sweep is declared illegal or cancelled, the budget document will show continued receipts from the sweep for the full ten years of the projection. There is nothing of any policy significance here; itís just budgeting convention. As for the ten basis point increase in guaranty fees, unless there is some discussion about this elsewhere in the document (which I havenít read, and donít intend to), I would think that given the large amounts of red ink produced over the forecast horizon by the tax reform package and recent spending agreement, the budgeteers are looking for any credible assumptions they can make that will produce more revenue; every $25.7 billion they can put into their projections makes the projected deficit smaller."

I believe Phillips made clear he wanted to level the playing field.  raising the g-fees is a way to accomplish this.  other potential benefits of throwing this in there are a) it ramps up the estimated 10year revenues to Treasury to close to 200bn (from ~ 140bn last year), which raises the opportunity cost of shutting them down without warrant value (if they do indeed want them out of conservatorship)  and  b) it possibly creates more economic room for a healthy fee paid to the govt for an explicit guarantee.

 

cherzeca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1247
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9407 on: February 13, 2018, 10:01:39 AM »
@investorG

agree.  but what i find interesting is that while mnuchin has said over last year that he wants treasury to work with congress on a bipartisan basis, i have gleaned zero participation of treasury in that process to date.  neither mnuchin nor phillips have said anything about their involvement with senate banking committee staff.  watt has gotten involved but only from the outside sending in his fhfa perspectives letter.  i just think this cooperation stance is eyewash, and what treasruy is really doing is just giving congress some time and rope.

Eye4Valu

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 294
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9408 on: February 13, 2018, 10:30:44 AM »
@investorG

agree.  but what i find interesting is that while mnuchin has said over last year that he wants treasury to work with congress on a bipartisan basis, i have gleaned zero participation of treasury in that process to date.  neither mnuchin nor phillips have said anything about their involvement with senate banking committee staff.  watt has gotten involved but only from the outside sending in his fhfa perspectives letter.  i just think this cooperation stance is eyewash, and what treasruy is really doing is just giving congress some time and rope.

My guess would be because Mnuchin has a different plan in mind than the congressman, otherwise you would hear more support for their congressional proposals. Mnuchin does have more experience and knowledge in this department. Will be interesting to see what his thoughts are when he finally reveals them.

rros

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 449
Re: FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.
« Reply #9409 on: February 13, 2018, 01:13:56 PM »
Anybody thinks that today's price weakness is related to the news that Corker may be running for re-election?