It's still not clear to me why he hasn't been charged with insider trading.
A failure to consider his sale of Biglari Capital to Steak-n-Shake given his position and knowledge of a material insider (and non-public) event, which was likely to, and subsequently did, impact the stock price only because he held those shares through a hedge fund he controlled completely avoids the typical insider trading red flags but the end result is the same: an insider benefiting from material non-public information.
A failure to find this type of transaction to be considered "insider trading" dramatically extends the reach of "insiders" and opens the flood gates as insiders can now, easily and cheaply, insulate themselves from insider trading charges simply by holding company shares through a hedge fund they control and selling the fund management co. This creates a totally perverse incentive.
I can't believe no one as wsj or nyt has written this up.