Author Topic: Why 5 years sunset clause is a show stopper?  (Read 1645 times)

alertmeipp

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2532
Why 5 years sunset clause is a show stopper?
« on: June 10, 2018, 05:19:49 AM »
Trump or any future president or prime minster can tear it apart anyways even without the sunset clause? What am i missing?


EliG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 411
Re: Why 5 years sunset clause is a show stopper?
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2018, 06:53:04 AM »
Tearing NAFTA apart comes with a heavy political cost because you are harming a bunch of people. Sunset clause reduces that cost. It's easier politically to sit back, do nothing and let NAFTA expire than to explicitly tear it apart.

Second order effect: sunset clause creates a perpetual uncertainty around NAFTA. With potential sunset hanging over their heads, companies are less likely to choose Canada or Mexico for long-term investments. Sunset clause is a round-about way to gain advantage over your trade partners.

bizaro86

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 611
Re: Why 5 years sunset clause is a show stopper?
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2018, 06:53:45 AM »
Sunset clause means inertia will kill it. Some president won't bother renewing, or won't get trade authority, or whatever. Cancelling is a change you have to actively make, which is politically harder because you have to defend it at the time.

rb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: Why 5 years sunset clause is a show stopper?
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2018, 08:26:27 AM »
The reason why it's a show stopper is because it's highly disruptive to business. Businesses like continuity and stability of the environment they operate in. If For example, if I'm looking to build a factory that will also service the US I'm planning to have that factory for more than 5 years. If I don't know whether Canada will have free trade with the US in 5 years, will I make that investment? I'm not so sure. NAFTA doesn't even need to get rescinded, it could just be tweaked a little just enough to screw my business.

That's not a good business environment to operate in. Yes NAFTA could be rescinded at any time. But the assumption is that it won't because it would be quite damaging to the party that pulls out. That's why countries sign treaties as opposed to making deals with individual administrations that can change with political whims.

Agreeing to a sunset clause basically guarantees that we go through the current shit show every 5 years. And nobody trusts US politicians to do the right thing. The US debt ceiling was put in place to make it easier for the US Treasury to borrow. Instead is now used as a weapon with politicians threatening to put the United States in default. Why would we import that insanity and instability into our business climate?

This is why a sunset clause is a show stopper. You're better off with no treaty than one with a sunset clause. Agreeing to a sunset clause would be a trade malpractice and a colossally stupid thing to do.

Viking

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1218
Re: Why 5 years sunset clause is a show stopper?
« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2018, 09:46:40 AM »
Canada is certainly in a difficult position. It has integrated/hitched its economy to the US for decades; worked well for both countries for many years. Trump is turning everything on its head. And Trump has already won. Who in their right mind is building a new plant in Canada to service the US market? Can you imagine the discussions in the various board rooms right now on this topic? Trump wanting a 5 year sunset clause is another step; the threat alone will ensure most businesses take a pass on investing in Canada. Hard to see how this does not get much worse, absent Trump being removed from office. Fall elections in the US become even more significant; if Dems canít take back control of the House of Reps then Trump will continue down his merry path.

RichardGibbons

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 633
Re: Why 5 years sunset clause is a show stopper?
« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2018, 10:41:51 AM »
Hard to see how this does not get much worse, absent Trump being removed from office. Fall elections in the US become even more significant; if Dems canít take back control of the House of Reps then Trump will continue down his merry path.

Yeah, it's unclear to me why anyone would bother seriously negotiating with Trump. He's capricious--even if Canada concedes on one point in return for USA conceding on another point, I'd be worried that the next day Trump would un-concede the USA side while demanding Canada's concession remain.  There's no reason to hold serious discussions when that's the person on the other side of the table.

So, I think the optimal strategy is to compliment Trump a lot, discuss all the talking points in depth and adjourn the meetings as much as possible, but not actually try to negotiate a deal. Essentially, just do what you can to keep the current agreement in place, but for actual negotiations, wait for the next guy since the next guy might want to negotiate in good faith.

doughishere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1228
Re: Why 5 years sunset clause is a show stopper?
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2018, 11:37:30 AM »
I offer my heartfelt apologies on behalf of many Americans.

Hahaha

SharperDingaan

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2725
Re: Why 5 years sunset clause is a show stopper?
« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2018, 11:38:12 AM »
NAFTA has a 10 year reversible termination transition.
Even if the plug is pulled tomorrow, NAFTA will continue through the next 2 1/2 electoral cycles - and the chump can do absolutely nothing about it. Nobody would negotiate a shorter term, and nobody would enter into one-sided bi-lateral trade with such a dominant partner. Yet the chump is f***** if he can't get a 5-year sunset clause?

Is the chump likely to still be president in 10 years?
Are successor administrations likely to be as disruptive as this one?
If the answer is 'no' - the responsible thing is to continually make the case that restricting free trade hurts everyone, and not negotiate. That hypothetical new foreign plant isn't going to get built in the US either, as who would want to deal with an administration that tore up a free trade deal that worked - for a long time, and very well? That hypthetical new domestic plant ain't going to be exporting either, so it can only be a smaller plant employing fewer people (smaller market + robots replacing people). Real smart.

The players might change, but the show will go on.

SD

 
« Last Edit: June 10, 2018, 11:40:32 AM by SharperDingaan »

rb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: Why 5 years sunset clause is a show stopper?
« Reply #8 on: June 10, 2018, 12:58:31 PM »
Canada is certainly in a difficult position. It has integrated/hitched its economy to the US for decades; worked well for both countries for many years. Trump is turning everything on its head. And Trump has already won. Who in their right mind is building a new plant in Canada to service the US market? Can you imagine the discussions in the various board rooms right now on this topic? Trump wanting a 5 year sunset clause is another step; the threat alone will ensure most businesses take a pass on investing in Canada. Hard to see how this does not get much worse, absent Trump being removed from office. Fall elections in the US become even more significant; if Dems canít take back control of the House of Reps then Trump will continue down his merry path.
I wouldn't be so quick to declare a victory because the converse is also true. If you are looking to produce an export good why in your right mind would invest in production in the US. If you produce a mixed good that you sell domestically and abroad why would you invest to expand production when you could be hit with retaliatory tariffs at any moment?

Also even with tariffs why would a company invest in US production in an area where it's at a comparative disadvantage when a few years from now this lunacy can go away? For example why would a company invest in aluminium capacity when in the near future it's at risk of competing with Quebec aluminium who's cost it has no hope of matching?

Furthermore, don't you put American exports at risk when you tax their materials? Aren't Airbus planes gonna be cheaper than Boeing if Boeing has to pay 10% more for aluminium? What about autos? Those things use A LOT of aluminium these days. If demand goes down for these products won't there be layoffs? What about the industries that are targeted by retaliatory tariffs? Harley is already doing layoffs. Won't those get worse when Europe slaps tariff on its products?

Is this what victory looks like? So much winning...

John Hjorth

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1594
Re: Why 5 years sunset clause is a show stopper?
« Reply #9 on: June 10, 2018, 01:23:59 PM »
... Yeah, it's unclear to me why anyone would bother seriously negotiating with Trump. He's capricious--even if Canada concedes on one point in return for USA conceding on another point, I'd be worried that the next day Trump would un-concede the USA side while demanding Canada's concession remain.  There's no reason to hold serious discussions when that's the person on the other side of the table. ...

He's not only capricious, Richard. He has - at least to me - demonstrated as a fact by now, within the last day and night, or so, that he is also impulsive, and to some extent bordering to being choleric. A highroller & gambler, who's capricious, impulsive and bordering choleric, using a lot of leverage. The leverage of the office [the office, which he does not in any way own], combined with the skin in the game of all others.

It feels unpleasant.
« Last Edit: June 10, 2018, 01:27:09 PM by John Hjorth »
ĒIn the race of excellence Ö there is no finish line.Ē
-HH Sheikh Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice President and Prime Minister of the United Arab Emirates and Ruler of Dubai