Author Topic: Schultz for President?  (Read 1689 times)

Cardboard

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3267
Schultz for President?
« on: January 27, 2019, 04:26:13 PM »
I don't agree with all his proposed policies but, he is credible and should be respected running as an Independent.

Could not believe some of the questions on CBS: "You are Jewish?", "Will you be on all 50 States ballots? "Will cost you a lot of money."

It should be obvious to everyone by now that the press is entirely a Democrat machine. They will start demonizing and discrediting this guy even if many of his policies would be nearly identical to those proposed by a Democrat.

Cardboard



Gregmal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2257
Re: Schultz for President?
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2019, 04:37:44 PM »
Yup, and if reports are true, he is already getting lambasted by Democrats for considering running. Same with Bloomberg. It seems the libtards are allergic to competent candidates. Koobalo 2020, then Cortazio 2028, bank on it!

michaelj

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Schultz for President?
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2019, 10:32:10 AM »
Yeah, and it's a 100% rational reaction by democrats.  A credible third party candidate who will draw more votes from democrats than republicans?  But not enough to win the election? Bloomberg studied this extensively and it's why he stayed on the sidelines

Gregmal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2257
Re: Schultz for President?
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2019, 11:55:25 AM »
One could probably say this is at the very least, interfering with, or trying to influence the outcome of an election. At least if we're going by what's now considered meddling. What are the odds we get a special counsel?

Cardboard

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3267
Re: Schultz for President?
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2019, 12:04:02 PM »
I don't disagree however ask yourself this question, why are Democrats not trying to entice him to be one of their star candidates instead of demonizing him?

Reading some of the commentaries from Democrats today, there seems to be no comprehension that what is needed to beat Donald Trump IMO is to have a smart, rational individual who is likely to steal from moderate Republicans vs some of the extreme left candidates which they seem to favour such as Elizabeth Warren.

Cardboard

Spekulatius

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3270
Re: Schultz for President?
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2019, 12:16:03 PM »
I don't disagree however ask yourself this question, why are Democrats not trying to entice him to be one of their star candidates instead of demonizing him?

Reading some of the commentaries from Democrats today, there seems to be no comprehension that what is needed to beat Donald Trump IMO is to have a smart, rational individual who is likely to steal from moderate Republicans vs some of the extreme left candidates which they seem to favour such as Elizabeth Warren.

Cardboard

I believe that Schultz running on a Democratic Party platform would pot. draw support  from both the business community as well as from progressive groups within the party. It is exactly the kind of candidate the Dems should be considering.

Then again, itís a whole lot easier to float the idea of a candidacy, then to follow through with the grind <g>.
To be a realist, one has to believe in miracles.

michaelj

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Schultz for President?
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2019, 12:50:38 PM »
I don't disagree however ask yourself this question, why are Democrats not trying to entice him to be one of their star candidates instead of demonizing him?

Cardboard

Well, in my view, it's because the base has shifted too far to the left and they don't believe he represents the majority views of the party.  And they may be right.  Personally I'd like to see him swallow his pride, run as a democrat, and see if he can galvanize centrist democrats enough to at a minimum reframe the narrative and drive the party back towards the center, even if he isn't electable. Call it the inverse Bernie effect. Folks in the business will decry the destabilizing effects of a polarized primary, but at the end of the day, the democrats are far more united by a desire to unseat Trump than by any specific set of policies. And who knows, maybe we'll find out democrats aren't actually as far to the left as we think - after all, twitter and cable news is not reality 

Cardboard

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3267
Re: Schultz for President?
« Reply #7 on: January 28, 2019, 03:54:46 PM »
"the democrats are far more united by a desire to unseat Trump than by any specific set of policies"

And that is really a problem for them IMO in terms of presenting a suitable alternative.

They should focus instead on what the majority of people want and not pleasing some desire or set political agenda. Or trying to put in flame half to 3/4 of the country in order to reach their extreme agenda.

Isn't clear yet why Trump won in 2016?

My view: People didn't like Hillary, didn't want a 2nd Clinton and felt that this guy cared much more about their needs with feasible solutions.

Cardboard