Author Topic: Fairfax 2020  (Read 19036 times)

petec

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
Re: Fairfax 2020
« Reply #120 on: March 21, 2020, 03:29:04 AM »

1) I havenít thought it through your way, because I donít know the regulatory rules, but theyíre at $800m ish now and said that $1bn was a reachable target before spreads gapped out, so I can only assume itís more reachable now.


There are two things that have happened over the past few weeks.  The spreads have gapped out, but the risk-free has fallen like a stone:

https://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates-bonds/government-bonds/us

Short-term governments have dropped from ~2.4% interest in 2019 to ~0.4% interest today, and it has occurred across all short maturities from 3 months to 2 years.  Any governments that need to be rolled in 2020 will face a drastically lower rate.  FFH has $8B of bonds that mature during 2020 and probably about $10b or $11b of cash equivalents.  Assuming that is 75% governments, that might be a total of about $13B in governments that will take a 2% interest rate haircut during 2020, which might reduce interest income by ~$260m for the government portion of the portfolio.  Assuming that there is $5B of corporates that will be rolled, you'd need to gain an extra 500 bps on the corporates you roll to just offset the lower interest rates on the governments.  The math is not particularly nice for FFH on this front.


SJ

No thatís fair. I guess my base case is that when we come out of this the reverse happens: short govt yields rise and spreads compress. That means the short govts donít have to roll onto much lower rates but that anything thatís been redeployed into corporates earns a higher rate. I think thatís reasonably probable, but itís also a best case.
FFH MSFT BRK BAM ATCO LNG IHG TFG CGT DC/A


petec

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
Re: Fairfax 2020
« Reply #121 on: March 21, 2020, 03:30:45 AM »
I just hope that they are not shorting all the wrong names Einhorn-style (I.e. all FANG powerhouses listed in the Annual Letter)

I do think itís very odd, the stocks they chose to highlight in the letter. Ok theyíre not optically cheap, but theyíve largely got spectacular business models and growth. There was likely a bubble in some names, and particularly among the unprofitable story stocks, but not the ones they named.
FFH MSFT BRK BAM ATCO LNG IHG TFG CGT DC/A

Xerxes

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: Fairfax 2020
« Reply #122 on: March 21, 2020, 02:33:23 PM »
For those of us who are uninitiated in the world corporate bond trading, is there an index based on European corporate bonds that can be bought to capitalize on the short-med term widening of credit spreads ?


petec

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
Re: Fairfax 2020
« Reply #124 on: Today at 04:23:46 AM »
Just going through the call.

Eurolife buyout will probably be done by Eurolife, not holdco.

Brit will be about $100m.

Allied is bigger but given capital at Allied I wonder if Allied could also buy itself.

I wonder if this is a piece of the holdco liquidity puzzle that we are missing.

doesn't answer how they fund premium growth though.
FFH MSFT BRK BAM ATCO LNG IHG TFG CGT DC/A

bearprowler6

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
Re: Fairfax 2020
« Reply #125 on: Today at 06:47:08 AM »
Status of OMERS purchase of 40% of Riverstone UK?

When the deal was announced on December 20/19 it was expected to close by end of Q1 2020 (subject to regulatory approval).

Well here we are...at the end of Q1 2020. Any news on this deal?


Cigarbutt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2146
Re: Fairfax 2020
« Reply #126 on: Today at 08:21:05 AM »
Status of OMERS purchase of 40% of Riverstone UK?
When the deal was announced on December 20/19 it was expected to close by end of Q1 2020 (subject to regulatory approval).
Well here we are...at the end of Q1 2020. Any news on this deal?
FWIW, the European Commission cleared the merger on Feb 26 (simplified merger review procedure).