Author Topic: How do you analyze asset managers like OAK?  (Read 689 times)

muscleman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3262
How do you analyze asset managers like OAK?
« on: January 14, 2020, 01:03:15 PM »
Are they generally valued on some multiple of AUM? Do they generally trade with high correlation to the stock index? How do you identify good asset manager stocks vs bad ones?
I am muslceman. I have more muscle than brain!


Tim Eriksen

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 790
Re: How do you analyze asset managers like OAK?
« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2020, 02:01:09 PM »
Are they generally valued on some multiple of AUM? Do they generally trade with high correlation to the stock index? How do you identify good asset manager stocks vs bad ones?

In general they trade at a multiple of AUM; however since fees vary widely versus twenty years ago that greatly impacts the valuation.  A sub-advisor earning 30 bps or a fixed income manager earning 40-50 bps is not near the same as an equity manager at 80-120 bps.  ETF have even lower fees, hedge funds much higher.  Then you factor in operating margin.  Traditionally average 30-35% but some are clearly take a bigger piece of the pie than others.  So basically I guess it is really based on free cash flow and not AUM.   :)

Look at fund performance (actual investing) and fund flows (which shows how good the marketing is).     

Broeb22

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 235
Re: How do you analyze asset managers like OAK?
« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2020, 02:21:15 PM »
Its a combination of:

Fee-related earnings at a higher multiple (maybe 15x)
Incentive-related earnings at a lower multiple (maybe 5-10x)
Value of the balance sheet investments in their own funds or others (OAK owned a part of Doubleline which is quite valuable)

muscleman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3262
Re: How do you analyze asset managers like OAK?
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2020, 07:01:59 AM »
Its a combination of:

Fee-related earnings at a higher multiple (maybe 15x)
Incentive-related earnings at a lower multiple (maybe 5-10x)
Value of the balance sheet investments in their own funds or others (OAK owned a part of Doubleline which is quite valuable)

What do you think of AB? The PE is just 13.
I am muslceman. I have more muscle than brain!

Broeb22

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 235
Re: How do you analyze asset managers like OAK?
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2020, 05:35:30 PM »
Iím not very familiar with AB but I believe theyíre a traditional asset mgr. and have very limited incentive fees. Looks like they have $2.30 in trailing EPS and about $5 in cash per share so youíre paying about 12x earnings for a business (active mgmt.) that doesnít have a ton of tailwinds. I would try to model what happens if their average mgmt. fee gets cut in half and see what you would pay then because fees are definitely not going up. If youíre comfortable with earnings after fees cut in half, then I think youíre buying a traditional asset mgr. conservatively. I donít have the same immediate concerns about fee compression for alternative mgrs. although if returns stay low long enough everyone likely gets squeezed.