NTLS
Quote from: thepupil on June 30, 2015, 04:36:15 AMHi longinvestor,I think investment / share will overstate BRK IVhttp://www.cornerofberkshireandfairfax.ca/forum/berkshire-hathaway/i-hate-this-post/msg213620/#msg213620http://brooklyninvestor.blogspot.com/2013/03/value-of-investments-per-share.htmlhttp://brooklyninvestor.blogspot.com/2011/12/so-what-is-berkshire-hathaway-really.htmlI'm confused by the concept of retained earning being a separate component of value. When you are valuing investments / share & the current estate of operating businesses, does not the value thereof include the PV of their reinvested earnings? Isn't an earnings multiple simply a shorthand DCF with an implied growth rate? The growth comes from reinvested retained earnings, right?I thought about that and to keep past clearly separate from future, the PV only includes RE from year 2012 onwards. All prior RE ignored in PV calculation. Also on #2, used a 10x multiple for a business where earnings have grown 20% for a very long time. Surely no double counting, no ?RE, as described by WEB is in lieu of dividend payouts. If $400B were to be paid out over the next 20 years and we reinvested it, isn't that separate from operating earnings? Both BNSF and BHE, where the lion's share is being retained are choosing to do this (100%). So yes, Vinod's suggestion is to estimate BRK's IV from earnings growth rate. If my thesis is correct, the recently burgeoning RE story should show up in a higher earnings growth than 20%! Just working with my boredom and tired of only using past #s
Hi longinvestor,I think investment / share will overstate BRK IVhttp://www.cornerofberkshireandfairfax.ca/forum/berkshire-hathaway/i-hate-this-post/msg213620/#msg213620http://brooklyninvestor.blogspot.com/2013/03/value-of-investments-per-share.htmlhttp://brooklyninvestor.blogspot.com/2011/12/so-what-is-berkshire-hathaway-really.htmlI'm confused by the concept of retained earning being a separate component of value. When you are valuing investments / share & the current estate of operating businesses, does not the value thereof include the PV of their reinvested earnings? Isn't an earnings multiple simply a shorthand DCF with an implied growth rate? The growth comes from reinvested retained earnings, right?
Bought a small position in CHAD yesterday for a bearish view on the Chinese market. This is after seeing that the chinese government implemented various desperate / foolish policies to try support the stock market index values with muted effect. The retail investors which constituted 80% of the Chinese stock market will continue to exit their (margined) positions. Up 10% today.