It's impressive how asserting things in a confident tone and implying things without really saying them will keep some people believing you all the way down...
This stock is down 99.7% from peak and 99% since this thread was created. Nobody has made money on this, except management through salaries, and maybe someone that was short from the start (which I haven't seen in this thread, and I've read all pages), and even then we'd have to look at borrow and option costs vs. the opportunity cost of just owning an index that went up massively during that same period (so the net loss is even bigger than 99.7%, as crazy as that sounds--from OBE peak, SPY is up 182% and NASDAQ 291%, so the delta is around 3-4x, and if you beat indexes (why invest actively otherwise?), it's even more).
This is a very volatile stock that is basically an equity stub, so at some point it may spike, maybe 50% or 100%, who knows, and then some people will say they were right about it, just had to be patient, etc. I know that day is coming. But I'm also pretty sure that the odds that their average cost basis + opportunity cost will be anywhere close to the bottom tick is very low... So let's be careful about bagholder-accounting of only looking at the last trade rather than all the capital used and over what period. When things go down this much this fast, you need multi-baggers just to partially get out of the hole, it's almost impossible.
