The checked boxes could probably be expounded on in the "public narrative" section. Instead it reads only "PIU Investigation". There is no indication she was killed anywhere in the report or that a battering ram was used. My police report from being rear ended last year is much more detailed.
Absolutely agree. Something this major should've had some serious narrative. This looks like the bare minimum they had to provide. 100% dishonest by omission but not falsifying. This is the other extreme of the MSM that paints BT as 100 innocent civilian who happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time. The real answer, as per usual, is somewhere in the middle.
I agree the police were justified in obtaining the search warrant. I am more questioning the standard to which we hold our police. Why serve a search warrant at 1am? I tend to think the officers probably announced themselves once when they first knocked as the one witness accounts. The occupants were probably asleep or just woken up when the announcement was made. No more announcements, just another 45 seconds of door pounding before they battered it in. It sounds like the police were trying to intimidate them. When things went wrong, the police report was 100% dishonest by omission, growing up in a conservative God fearing home, my mother would have said I was lying/falsifying but the semantics are important I suppose. I understand supporting the rule of law, all the support the blue hashtags, but we should expect better. Instead of trying to do better we are chanting black or blue lives matter. One side of the coin directly answers to the public and common sense reforms shouldn't be impossible to implement. As for police unions, imagine how quickly their tune would change of they were financially responsible for their union members behavior. The city of Louisville paid Brianna's family 12m; immagine of that came out of police pensions, how quickly they could implement reforms.
