Author Topic: Full recount by hand it will be  (Read 36067 times)

rb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4085
Re: Full recount by hand it will be
« Reply #70 on: November 21, 2020, 03:54:29 PM »
LOL! What would their cause of action be against Hunter Binden?


Parsad

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9237
Re: Full recount by hand it will be
« Reply #71 on: November 21, 2020, 07:48:58 PM »
So Parsad, you put more credence to such information with no source than multiple citizens who have sat down and filed an Affidavit under oath and punishable by law as perjury?

Buffett says that he looks for three things in people...intelligence, energy and integrity.  And if they don't have the last one, don't bother with the other two.

I don't know who CNN's source is, but if I had to take Obama's word without an affidavit and Trump's with an affidavit...I would put a hell of a lot more stock in Obama's.

You seem to have changed a lot since Fairfax old days. Brolgaboy vs trying to find the truth.

I haven't changed at all.  Just like I put more stock in Prem's words...and my own analysis of Fairfax...I put more stock in the words of people other than Trump, only because I have done my own analysis of him.   Whereas you take Trump's word without doing any analysis! 

Brolgaboy has more credibility than Trump!  And I couldn't give two f**ks about Brolgaboy!  Cheers!
No man is a failure who has friends!

rb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4085
Re: Full recount by hand it will be
« Reply #72 on: November 21, 2020, 10:01:21 PM »
So we're at the point where the CIA provided Hugo Chavez with the technology to overturn the election - which in turn passed it to Dominion for this purpose - and Gov Kemp of Georgia (historically a great ally of the democrats  ::)) and the Georgia Secretary of State (another great democrat  ::)) were bribed by Dominion to implement it in order to swing the election to Joe Biden.

This would be sad if it wasn't so pathetic.

At this point I'm fairly confident that any day now Fidel Castro will come back from the dead just to stick one up to Donald Trump.
« Last Edit: November 21, 2020, 10:03:10 PM by rb »

Value^2

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 388
Re: Full recount by hand it will be
« Reply #73 on: November 22, 2020, 10:07:16 AM »
I'm feeling that this dominion soft thing, might be similar to college admission scandal... except, much bigger and international. 
Where rich dudes has been buying their votes. And lets face it, Briden was the ultimate 'big stack bully', during last election.

Can't wait when he & other deep state operatives are sent to prison.

I think investigators should follow the money.

copelandlewis

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Full recount by hand it will be
« Reply #74 on: November 22, 2020, 10:15:04 AM »
If Trump is so concerned about voter fraud and ensuring free and fair elections, why isnt he asking for recounts of states he won as well? If votes for Biden could be fraudulent then  votes for Trump could be fraudulent as well.



Value^2

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 388
« Last Edit: November 22, 2020, 10:41:15 AM by Value^2 »

Spekulatius

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: Full recount by hand it will be
« Reply #76 on: November 22, 2020, 10:51:42 AM »
No it won’t - lawsuit in PA also dismissed:
https://twitter.com/andrewfeinberg/status/1330290872395714564?s=21

So, the hand recount negated the thesis of the voting machines being an issue, what is the next thesis? I just follow lawsuits outcome and the certifications of state elections. Nothing else matters.

Lately, the only thing positive for the Trump Organization are his sons tests results.

#Lawnandorder
« Last Edit: November 22, 2020, 11:12:11 AM by Spekulatius »
Life is too short for cheap beer and wine.

cubsfan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2413
Re: Full recount by hand it will be
« Reply #77 on: November 22, 2020, 01:30:29 PM »
^ It's dismissed by PA Courts, maybe just in time to appeal to US Supreme Court.

No problem with Trump following the Constitution and legal system to get around a corrupt state like PA.

Gotta love that Sydney Powell is not intimidated by the scum in D.C.
« Last Edit: November 22, 2020, 01:32:52 PM by cubsfan »

rb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4085
Re: Full recount by hand it will be
« Reply #78 on: November 22, 2020, 01:48:14 PM »
^ It's dismissed by PA Courts, maybe just in time to appeal to US Supreme Court.

No problem with Trump following the Constitution and legal system to get around a corrupt state like PA.

Gotta love that Sydney Powell is not intimidated by the scum in D.C.
I'm not a lawyer and even I know that that case won't make it to the supreme court. It won't even make it to the 3rd circuit unfortunately.

cubsfan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2413
Re: Full recount by hand it will be
« Reply #79 on: November 22, 2020, 02:08:52 PM »
^ Well, I'm certainly not a lawyer.

But you're not Alan Dershowitz either - so I will go with his opinion:



DERSHOWITZ: Well, let me give you my completely objective, not wishful thinking, constitutional analysis.

They have two or three legal constitutional paths. For example, in Pennsylvania, they have two very strong legal arguments, one, that the courts changed what the legislature did about counting ballots after the end of Election Day.

Thatís a winning issue in the Supreme Court. I donít necessarily support it, but itís a winning issue in the Supreme Court. And Justice Alito has already hinted thatís a winning issue.


They also have a winning issue on the Supreme Court on equal protection, that some counties allowed flawed ballots to be cured, while others didnít. Bush vs. Gore suggests that an equal protection argument can prevail.

The problem with that argument is, they donít have the numbers necessarily to support it. If itís right that Biden is ahead by some 70,000 or 80,000 votes, they have to show enough contested votes, under those two legal theories, to change the outcome.

The other legal theory they had, which is a potentially strong one, is that the computers, either fraudulently or by glitches, changed hundreds of thousands of votes. There are enough votes to make a difference, but I havenít seen the evidence to support that.

So, in one case, they donít have the numbers. In another case, they donít seem yet to have the evidence. Maybe they do. I havenít seen it. But the legal theory is there to support them if they have the numbers and they have the evidence.