Yes, my mistake In that case, he was more than justified firing at cops, indeed. Fire away!
From what I have read, the police were executing a “no knock warrant” when they were fired upon from within the room. Returning fire would be a logical thing to do. However, there is certainly some blame involved in originating the warrant with an erroneous address.
Most recent writing indicates that the police had the no-knock warrant but they didn't execute it and they announced themselves. The address was also correct as BT's ex had close contact with her and there is some (very weak) evidence of her handling his money and potentially drugs/weapons.
Remember, we are now operating in a new political world here in the good ole USA.
We have gone from protesting police brutality - full circle now - to black crimes against police.
Now, it's perfectly acceptable for blacks to disrespect the police, resist arrest, fight the police, tase the police, take their weapons, shoot at the police,
and kill the police. Only if you are black (or their agents). Then you have all the right in the world to riot, loot, burn and kill others. All these are now perfectly
acceptable modes of behavior in the name of "social justice" and fighting "systematic racism".
Only in America, unfortunately. I may have to move to Canada with CW!
.
Apparently.
No apparently according to you hypocrites the 2nd amendment does not apply to people of color. People of color are supposed to not defend themselves when someone breaks down their door in the middle of the night. 100 years later and how little some things have changed since the 1919s.
Adesigar - try not to be an idiot if you can. I know it might be tough for you.
Who said anything about the 2nd amendment? Or people of color defending themselves?
Just say what you mean and call us racists.
It's a good look for you when you can not come up with a rational argument.
You learned well from your virtue signaling buddies on the LEFT - when all else fails - call them racists and bigots.
Put yourself in the situation:
-You awake at 1am to "bang, bang, bang" on your door
-You yell "Who's there"
-No answer
-"bang, bang, bang"
-You grab your gun and go in the hallway and again yell "Who's there!"
-No answer
-Door explodes off its hinges because its been hit by a battering ram.
-You shoot the first guy through the door
-The two plain clothes dudes rush into your house yelling police, and shoot 20 rounds, another dude is shooting blindly through your apartment window
-Your girl friend is shot 6 times
-A police officer radios for an ambulance for his partner who got shot in the leg (they previously sent the ambulance away because they didn't need it)
-EMTs get there and start administering aid to the injured police officer, your girl friend dies sometime in the 20 minutes between the call for help and EMTs turning their attention to her
-Police officer firing through the window disappears - his partners don't know where he went and is unreachable.
-Police book you for attempted murder of a police officer
-Police file a report that says no suspects were injured and the apartment was not entered forcibly, no mention of the 4th uniformed officer on scene
-Family fights for answers - no body cameras were turned over, disappearing officer is fired, all charges are dropped against boyfriend (you)
Given the situation above, what is a responsible gun toting second amendment supporting citizen to do? The police claim they announced themselves. Something neighbors and Walker refute. This could all be cleared up with body camera footage. The three plain clothes officers are not required to wear the cams and said they were not that night, but the three officer in question do regularly wear cameras when serving warrants. The 4th uniformed officer is required to wear his body cam, but the footage has never been turned over. The DA seemed to agree Walker was defending himself, dropping all charges against him.
